<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: J.K. Rowling in NY to testify in Harry Potter case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ansleyasher.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/jk-rowling-in-ny-to-testify-in-harry-potter-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ansleyasher.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/jk-rowling-in-ny-to-testify-in-harry-potter-case/</link>
	<description>writing thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ansleyasher</title>
		<link>http://ansleyasher.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/jk-rowling-in-ny-to-testify-in-harry-potter-case/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>ansleyasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ansleyasher.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I feel now that I should have been more clear. Of course I am opposed to an author&#039;s work being outright stolen. But I do believe that derivative works have a place. The questions I have are concerning that place. Which is why I find it interesting that Mr. Petit points out that in his opinion it&#039;s a trademark suit (at least, the vibe I&#039;m getting is that it&#039;s his opinion only). I&#039;ve read that this lexicon is mainly taking lots of tiny slices of Ms. Rowling&#039;s work and reorganizing them, which makes it different than the other lexicons. I haven&#039;t read the lexicon myself, though, so that makes me a poor source on the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel now that I should have been more clear. Of course I am opposed to an author&#8217;s work being outright stolen. But I do believe that derivative works have a place. The questions I have are concerning that place. Which is why I find it interesting that Mr. Petit points out that in his opinion it&#8217;s a trademark suit (at least, the vibe I&#8217;m getting is that it&#8217;s his opinion only). I&#8217;ve read that this lexicon is mainly taking lots of tiny slices of Ms. Rowling&#8217;s work and reorganizing them, which makes it different than the other lexicons. I haven&#8217;t read the lexicon myself, though, so that makes me a poor source on the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atika</title>
		<link>http://ansleyasher.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/jk-rowling-in-ny-to-testify-in-harry-potter-case/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Atika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ansleyasher.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Rowling, you are absolutely right. No one has  right to use the creativity of some other person for some financial gain. As literature is an art in which only the author who has originally produced it can fill colours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rowling, you are absolutely right. No one has  right to use the creativity of some other person for some financial gain. As literature is an art in which only the author who has originally produced it can fill colours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
